Efficacy after internal fixation on the posterior and lateral aspects of Weber B fibular fractures
Keywords:
eficacia, placas óseas, fijación interna de fracturas, peronéAbstract
Introduction: Weber B fractures are one of the most common ankle traumas, and therefore there have been numerous studies on their management and surgical techniques. The definitive approach is controversial in terms of its long-term effectiveness in the patient.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of internal fixation on the posterior and lateral aspects of Weber B fibular fractures in patients at Víctor Lazarte Echegaray Hospital from 2018 to 2023.
Methods: A retrospective, analytical, observational cohort study was conducted. Seventy two patients were evaluated: 24 from the exposed group (posterior aspect) and 48 from the unexposed group (lateral aspect). The efficacy of both techniques was analyzed by comparing functional and cosmetic outcomes, as well as disability duration and late morbidity.
Results: Osteosynthesis treatment on the posterior aspect, compared to the lateral aspect, showed better functional and cosmetic results, shorter disability duration, and lower late morbidity (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Plate osteosynthesis was more effective on the posterior aspect than on the lateral aspect.
Downloads
References
1. Taffinderc D, Esquivel A, Antonio A. Perfil epidemiológico de las fracturas de tobillo en el Hospital Regional “General Ignacio Zaragoza” del ISSSTE, CDMX. Acta Med GA. 2022;20(2):127-31. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/104272
2. Sthorayca R. Características clínicas epidemiológicas en pacientes con diagnóstico de fractura de tobillo atendidos en el servicio de traumatología del Hospital Hipólito Unanue de Tacna, 2019-2020 [Tesis de grado]. Tacna, Perú: Universidad Privada de Tacna; 2023 [acceso 24/01/2024]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.upt.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12969/2870
3. López FO, Espinoza JR, Llanos ER, Medina BA. Risk factors and complications of open ankle fractures. Univ Cienc Tecnol. 2019 [acceso 24/01/2024];1(1):5. Disponible en: https://uctunexpo.autanabooks.com/index.php/uct/article/view/198
4. Polzer H, Rammelt S. Fractures of the ankle joint. Unfallchirurg. 2021;124(3):173-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-021-00968-x
5. Brenes M. Manejo de fracturas abiertas. Rev Méd Sinerg. 2020;5(4):e440. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31434/rms.v5i4.440
6. Ruiz P, Filippi J. An update on the work-up and management of ankle fractures: A literature review. Medwave. 2021;21(3):e8130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2021.03.8130
7. Bastías G, Bravo F, Astudillo C, Giannini E, Contreras M, Melo R, et al. Restoration of anatomic parameters and syndesmotic reduction after intramedullary nailing of distal fibular fractures. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022;7(4):24-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114221141388
8. Lin X, Tu C, Lin W, Xie W, Guo X, Liu Q. Comparison the treatment of anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament anatomical repair and syndesmosis screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries in ankle fracture. BMC Surg. 2023;23(1):80-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01982-z
9. Bae K, Kang S, Kim J, Lee J, Go T. Reduction and fixation of anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament avulsion fracture without syndesmotic screw fixation in rotational ankle fracture. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(4):30-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519882550
10. De Luna V, Caterini A, Casci C, Marsiolo M, Efremov K, De Maio F, et al. Clinical and radiological results after fracture-dislocations of the ankle: a medium- to long-term followup study. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022;7(2):30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7020030
11. Rooney E, Ruse S, Talusan P, Holmes J, Walton D. Midterm Follow-up of a novel algorithm for nonoperative Weber B ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2022;43(11):1434-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007221123794
12. Hegde A, Shetty C, Joseph N, Mane P. Comparison of posterior and lateral surface plating for type b weber lateral malleoli fractures. Foot Ankle Spec. 2022;7(2):155-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400221079197
13. Elwahab M, Salem A, Kotb A, El-ghammaz S. Is posterolateral plating better for fixation of Weber B distal fibular fractures than lateral plating. Current Orthop Practice. 2020;31(1):58-66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000000832
14. Deng Y, Staniforth T, Saqib M, Lau Y. Posterior antiglide plating vs lateral neutralization plating for weber b distal fibular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and biomechanical studies. Foot Ankle Int. 2022;43(6):850-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007221079617
15. Wenger D, Henning H, Bergkvist D, Rogmark C. Fewer reoperations after posterolateral plate positioning compared with lateral plate positioning in ankle fractures-a retrospective study on 453 AO/OTA 44-B injuries. 2021;52(7):1999-2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.008
16. Faldini C. Osteoarthritis after an ankle fracture: we can't really avoid it. Musculoskelet Surg. 2023;107(4):375-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-023-00802-0
17. Shin HK, Choi JY, Kang DH. Comparative study for the fixation method in the Danis-Weber type B lateral malleolar fractures: an antiglide plate fixation versus a lateral plate fixation. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2006 [acceso 01/07/2024];10(2):201-6. Disponible en: https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO200633839569110.page
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Renán Estuardo Vargas Morales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
