Primary Acetabular Revision: Incidence and Mechanisms of Bone Graft Use
Keywords:
primary acetabular revision, cemented and uncemented, bone graft.Abstract
Introduction: Primary acetabular replacement can become a highly complex intervention depending on the existing bone defect. Lesions can be segmental, cavitary, or combined. This last pattern is the one most frequently observed in periprosthetic bone loss due to aseptic loosening.
Objectives: To show the evolution of replacement surgery in hip arthroplasty, and to guide the surgeon in making individualized decisions, to avoid complications.
Method: A research was carried out on the study topic, by reviewing specialty textbooks, scientific articles published in different databases such as Pubmed/ MEDLINE, SciELO, BVS, Scopus, Ebsco, Google Scholar, Cochrane, as well as other inquiries in medical libraries.
Information analysis: Reconstruction planning priorities are established to provide a stable implant, restore bone mass, and optimize hip biomechanics, although it is the intraoperative findings that will definitely indicate the type of intervention to follow. The functional demands of the patients and the comorbidities must be considered, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the planned reconstruction.
Conclusions: Total hip arthroplasty has been shown to significantly improve the quality of life in patients, with low rate of complications. To prevent aseptic loosening, it is necessary to be careful in the technique of placement of the prosthetic components and to use the type of material most appropriate to the age, functional demand and bone reserve of each patient.
Downloads
References
García Cimbrelo, E: Revisión protésica del componente acetabular en la artroplastia total de cadera. Rev Ortop Traumatol(Madrid), abr 2002;44(2):168-177. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/ibc-4698
Castoldi, P; Distefano, C; Schachter, S: Revisión en artroplastia total de cadera: lado acetabular (Segunda Parte), Rev Asoc Arg Ortop y Traumatol, 58(2):188-197. https://www.aaot.org.ar/revista/1993_2002/1994/1994_3/590302.pdf
Amstutz, HC et al: Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolisis. Clin Orthop, 1992; 276:7. PMID: 1537177
Morray DW, Rushton N: Macrophages stimulate bone resorption when they phagocitose particles. JBJS, 1990; 72-B:988. PMID: 2246303 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B6.2246303
Schmalaried, TP: The mechanismo loosening of cemented acetabular components in THA: analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy Clin Orthop, 1991: 224:60. PMID: 1729024
Schmaloried TP et al: Periprosthetic bone loss in THA. Polyethilene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space JBJS, 1992; 74-A:849. PMID: 1634575
Burgo, FJ; Vindver, GI; Paprosky, WG; Rossemberg AG: Revisión acetabular: métodos de reconstrucción, indicaciones y resultados. Rev Asoc Arg Ortop y Traumatol, 2002; 67(2):130-140. https://www.aaot.org.ar/revista/1993_2002/2002/2002_2/670212.pdf
Jones LC, Hungerford DS: Cement disease. Clin Orthop 1987; 225:192-206. PMID: 3315375
Willert HG, Bertram H, Buchhorn GH: Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of bone cement fragmentation. Clin Orthop 1990; 258:108-121. PMID: 2203567
Reyes de la Parra, Vicente: Aflojamiento aséptico en la prótesis total de cadera. Orthotips Amot, 2019; 15(4):206-213. doi: 10.35366/94046
Howie DW, Neale SD, Martin W. Progression of periacetabular osteolytic lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94-A: e117. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01305
Jacobs JJ, Roebuck KA, Archibeck M, Hallab NJ, Glant TT. Osteolysis: basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393: 71-77. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00008
Archibeck M, Jacobs JJ, Roebuck K. The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82-A: 1478-1489. PMID: 11372314
Sheth NP, Rozell JC, Paprosky WG. Evaluation and treatment of patients with acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019; 27: e258-e267. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00685
Carbonel Escobar R. PTC no cementada con cúpula acetabular porosa y vástago anatómico. Resultados clínicos, radiológicos y desgaste del polietileno. Estudio prospectivo con seguimiento medio de 25 años. Tesis Doctoral. https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/690335
García Cimbrelo, E, y Munuera, L: Early and late loosening of the acetabular cup after low-friction arthropalsty. J Bone Joint Surg, 1992; 74A: 1119-1129. PMID: 1400540
Parra Gordo ML, Aroca Peinado M, Medina Diaz M, Castano Palacio DM, Caba Cuevas M, Gonzalez Sandra FJ: Aflojamiento protésico aseptico, osteolisis por microparticulas o síndrome de movilización protésica. Mgf. 2011, julio-agosto;141-580. http://mgyf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/revistas_antes/revista_141/578-581.pdf
Paprosky, WG; Perona PG, y Lawrence, JM: Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty,1994; 9: 33-44. doi: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x.
Judet, R; Judet, J, y Letournel, E: Fractures of the acetabulum. Classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg, 1964;46A: 1615-1646. PMID: 14239854
