Use of Bone Auto and Allograft, Rings and Cells in Primary Acetabular Revision

Authors

Keywords:

primary acetabular revision, bone autograft, bone allograft, rings, cells.

Abstract

Introduction: Currently there are tissue banks to meet the demand for bone grafting in orthopedic surgery. Although it is preferable to use the patient's own bone, in many cases this is not possible. The idea is to achieve a coverage in the defect bed that allows a mechanical stability of the implants, thus, prevent their early failure, and contribute to the formation of bone storage.

Objectives: To show the evolution of replacement surgery in hip arthroplasty and to highlight the usefulness of auto and bone allograft in the reconstruction of acetabular bone defect.

Methods: A review based on the study topic was carried out that included specialty textbooks, scientific articles published in Pubmed / MEDLINE, SciELO, BVS, Scopus, Ebsco, Google Scholar, Cochrane databases, as well as other consultations in medical libraries.

Information analysis and synthesis: Priorities in reconstruction planning were established to provide a stable implant, restore bone mass, and optimize hip biomechanics, although it is the intraoperative findings that will definitely indicate the type of intervention to follow. The functional demands of the patients and the comorbidities must be considered, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the planned reconstruction.

Conclusions: Reconstruction cells should be reserved for those circumstances in which massive acetabular deficiency with severe segmental defects requires the use of large structural grafts, leaving a neoacetabulum with less than 50% of the host bone surface. Priorities in reconstruction planning are to provide a stable implant, restore bone mass, and optimize hip biomechanics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fermín Osvaldo López Hernández., Complejo Científico Ortopédico Internacional “Frank País”, La Habana.

Profesor especialista en cirugía de cadera

References

Sancho-Navarro R, Valera-Pertegása, M, Farré-Crespob, J, Rourab S, Bayés-Genís A. Viabilidad celular en un aloinjerto de hueso esponjoso humano criopreservado. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2008;52:27-31 https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/47396/files/TESIS-2016-011.pdf

García Pérez, M. VIABILIDAD Y POSIBILIDAD DE REVASCULARIZACIÓN DE LOS ALOINJERTOS PERIOSTIO CRIOCONGELADOS. Dirigida por Luis Fernández Portal. Tesis doctoral. Salamanca 2001. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/institucion/usal/tesis?inicio=1961

Penderson W. Bone and soft-tissue reconstruction. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996;4.a ed,pp 353-423. https://www.worldcat.org/title/rockwood-and-greens-fractures-in-adults/oclc/22910571

Vicario C. Los aloinjertos óseos en Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Patología del Aparato Locomotor 2004;2(3):214-232 https://app.mapfre.com/ccm/content/documentos/fundacion/salud/revista-locomotor/vol02-n4-art6-aloinjertos-oseos.pdf

Giannoudis, PV. Dinopoulos, H. Tsiridis, E. Bone substitutes: An update. Injury 2005;36S:S20-S27. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029.

Seebach C, Schultheiss J, Wilhelm K, Frank J, Henrich D. Comparison of six bone-graft substitutes regarding to cell seeding efficiency, metabolism and growth behaviour of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in vitro. Injury 2010;41:731-38. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.017.

70. Álvarez Lozano E, Ripalda P, Forriol F. Reparación e integración de los injertos en cirugía ortopédica. Rev Mex Ortop Traum 2002;16(3):173-180. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/ortope/or-2002/or023m.pdf

71. Bauer TW, Muschler GF. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop 2000;371:10-27. PMID: 10693546

Calvo, F et al. Aloinjertos óseos y la función del banco de huesos. Rev Med Chile 2011;139:660-66. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rmc/v139n5/art15.pdf

Burgo FJ, Vindver GI, Paprosky WG, Rosenberg AG. Revisión acetabular: métodos de reconstrucción , indicaciones y resultados. Rev Asoc Arg Ortop Traumatol. 2002; 67 (2): 130-140. https://www.aaot.org.ar/revista/1993_2002/2002/2002_2/670212.pdf

O’Neill C, Creedon S, Brennan S, O’Mahony F, Lynham R, Guerin S, et al. Acetabular revision using trabecular metal augments for Paprosky type 3 defects. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 33 (3): 823-828. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.031. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

Sporer SM, O’Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction: average ten year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 760-765. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02099.

Jasty M, Harris WH. Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone de ciency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72: 63-67. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B1.2298796.

Schreurs BW, Keurentjes JC, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Veth RP. Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented acetabular component: a 20 to 25 year followup. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91: 1148-1153. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B9.21750.

D'Antonio JA: Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty, 1995; 6: 45. PMID: 10155689

Paprosky WG, Magnus RE: Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty: Acetabular technique. Clin Orthop, 1994; 298: 147. PMID: 8118969

Sloof TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, Schimmel JW, Huiskes R, Gardeniers J: Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop,1996; 324: 108. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00013.

Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Buma P, Gardeniers JW, Huiskes R: Acetabular revision with ímpacted morselized cancellous bone and cement: A 10 to 15-year follow-up of 60 revision arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Br),1998; 80: 391. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b3.8534.

Buma P, Lamerigts N, Schreurs VW, Gardeniers JWM, Versleyen B, Slooff TJJH: Graft incorporation after cemented acetabular revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Mar;(324):108-15.doi: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00013

Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RSM, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ: Contained morcellized allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty: Surgical technique. Orthop Clin North Am, 1993; 24: 717. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B1.8421012.

Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RSM, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ: Impacted cancellous allograft and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am, 1993; 24: 717. https://app.mapfre.com/fundacion/html/revistas/patologia/v5sI/pag02_02_bib.html

Heekin RD, Engh CA, Vinh T: Morcellized allograft acetabular reconstruction: a post- morten retrieval análisis. Clin Orthop,1995; 319: 184. PMID: 7554629

B.W. Schreurs, J.W. Gardeniers, T.J. Slooff. Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting: 20 years of experience. Instr Course Lect., 50 (2001), pp. 221-228 Medline PMID: 11372317

Published

2021-11-27

How to Cite

1.
López Hernández. FO. Use of Bone Auto and Allograft, Rings and Cells in Primary Acetabular Revision. Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatologí­a [Internet]. 2021 Nov. 27 [cited 2025 Feb. 2];35(3). Available from: https://revortopedia.sld.cu/index.php/revortopedia/article/view/481

Issue

Section

Artículo Especial