Empleo del videolaringoscopio VALOR en pacientes con patologías de la columna cervical

Authors

Keywords:

airway management, intratracheal intubation, laryngoscopy, laryngoscopes, spine cord, cervical cord.

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with cervical spine diseases present higher risk during tracheal intubation, since the traction force or movement generated during laryngoscopy may injure neuroaxial structures.

Objective: To characterize tracheal intubation with the VALOR videolaryngoscope in surgical patients with cervical spine diseases.

Methods: The VALOR videolaryngoscope was used in surgical patients with cervical spine diseases, from the pilot study within the institutional project VALOR (Videolaringoscopio ArtesanaL para entOrnos de Recursos limitados, the Spanish for artisanal videolaryngoscope for limited resources settings), carried out in the anesthesiology and resuscitation service of Complejo Científico Ortopédico Internacional Frank País from September 2022 to January 2024.

Results: Tracheal intubation was effective in all patients (n = 20), in an average time of 54 seconds. 85 % required a single intubation attempt, with an adequate view of the glottis. Adverse events included reflex tachycardia (35 %) and mild pharyngeal trauma (5 %), with no perioperative implications. External laryngeal manipulation maneuvers (95 %), use of bougie (100 %), indirect epiglottis elevation (70 %) and preference for hyperangulated blade (80 %) predominated.

Conclusions: The use of the VALOR videolaryngoscope allowed effective tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine diseases, in a short time, with optimal endoscopic visualization and a low incidence of adverse events.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Antonio Ismael Aparicio Morales, Complejo Científico Ortopédico Internacional Frank País

Especialista de Primer Grado en Anestesiología y Reanimación

Alexander Garzón Rodríguez, CCOI Frank País

Especialista en Ortopedia y Traumatología

María Oslaida Agüero Martínez, Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos Ameijeiras

Dra. C. Especialista en Anestesiología y Reanimación

Yaima Rizo Fiallo, CCOI Frank País

Especialista en Ortopedia y Traumatología

Esmildo Fiallo Ortiz, CCOI Frank País

Especialista en Ortopedia y Traumatología

Yanisleidy Rodríguez Arias, CCOI Frank País

Especialista en Anestesiología y Reanimación

References

Gadomski BC, Hindman BJ, Poland MJ, Page MI, Dexter F, Puttlitz CM. Intubation biomechanics: Computational modeling to identify methods to minimize cervical spine motion and spinal cord strain during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in an intact cervical spine. J Clin Anesth. 2022;81:110909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110909

Gadomski BC, Hindman BJ, Page MI, Dexter F, Puttlitz CM. Intubation biomechanics: clinical implications of computational modeling of intervertebral motion and spinal cord strain during tracheal intubation in an intact cervical spine. Anesthesiol. 2021;135(6):1055-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004024

Hindman BJ, Palecek JP, Posner KL, Traynelis VC, Lee LA, Sawin PD, et al. Cervical spinal cord, root, and bony spine injuries. A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiol. 2011;114(4):782-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182104859

Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiol. 2022;136(1):31-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002

Disma N, Asai T, Cools E, Cronin A, Engelhardt T, Fiadjoe J, et al. Airway management in neonates and infants. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024;41(1):1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001928

Gómez MÁ, Sastre JA, Onrubia X, López T, Abad A, Casans R, et al. Guía de la Sociedad Española De Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor (SEDAR), Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES) y Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello (SEORL-CCC) para el manejo de la vía aérea difícil. Parte II. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2024;71(3):207-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2023.08.001

Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;2022(4):CD011136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3

Lingappan K, Arnold JL, Fernandes CJ, Pammi M. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(6):CD009975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002%2F14651858.CD009975.pub3

Abdelgadir IS, Phillips RS, Singh D, Moncreiff MP, Lumsden JL. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(5):CD011413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002%2F14651858.CD011413.pub2

Choi S, Yoo HK, Shin KW, Kim YJ, Yoon HK, Park HP, et al. Videolaryngoscopy vs. flexible fibrescopy for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2023;78(8):970-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16035

Schoettker P, Arias AP, Pralong E, Duff JM, Fournier N, Bathory I. Airtraq® vs. fibreoptic intubation in patients with an unstable cervical spine fracture: A neurophysiological study. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2020;31:28-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2020.01.001

Jiang J, Ma DX, Li B, Wu AS, Xue FS. Videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscope for awake intubation – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:1955-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S172783

Alhomary M, Ramadan E, Curran E, Walsh SR. Videolaryngoscopy vs. fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:1058-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14299

El-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg. 1996;82(6):1197-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199606000-00017

Kheterpal S, Healy D, Aziz MF, Shanks AM, Freundlich RE, Linton F, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiol. 2013;119(6):1360-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000435832.39353.20

Kohse EK, Siebert HK, Sasu PB, Loock K, Dohrmann T, Breitfeld P, et al. A model to predict difficult airway alerts after videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airways-the VIDIAC score. Anaesthesia. 2022;77(10):1089-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15841

Chaggar RS, Shah SV, Berry M, Saini R, Soni S, Vaughan D. The Video Classification of Intubation (VCI) score: a new description tool for tracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy. A pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38(3):324-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001374

Tsan SEH, Ng KT, Lau J, Viknaswaran NL, Wang CY. A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Anesth. 2020;70(6):667-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.08.009

Lundstrøm LH, Duez CHV, Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Thomsen JL, Møller AM, et al. Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(5):CD009237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009237.pub2

Stein ML, Park RS, Kiss EE, Adams HD, Burjek NE, Peyton J, et al. Efficacy of a hybrid technique of simultaneous videolaryngoscopy with flexible bronchoscopy in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy in the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry. Anaesthesia. 2023;78(9):1093-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16049

Zhang J, Jiang W, Urdaneta F. Economic analysis of the use of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the surgical setting. J Comp Eff Res. 2021;10(10):831-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2021-0068

Fuller RG, Rossetto MA, Paulson MW, April MD, Ginde AA, Bebarta VS, et al. Market analysis of video laryngoscopy equipment for the role 1 setting. Mil Med. 2023;188(11):e3482-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usad189

Crosby ET, Duggan LV, Finestone PJ, Liu R, Gorter RD, Calder LA. Anesthesiology airway-related medicolegal cases from the Canadian Medical Protection Association. Can J Anesth. 2021;68(2):183-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01846-7

Shaw M, Waiting J, Barraclough L, Ting K, Jeans J, Black B. Airway events in obese vs. non-obese elective surgical patients: a cross-sectional observational study. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(12):1585-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15513

Endlich Y, Lee J, Culwick MD. Difficult and failed intubation in the first 4000 incidents reported on webAIRS. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020;48(6):477-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x20957657

Bicalho GP, Bessa RC, Cruvinel MCC, Carneiro FS, Castilho JB, Castro CHV. A prospective validation and comparison of three multivariate models for prediction of difficult intubation in adults patients. Braz J Anesth. 2023;73(2):153-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.07.028

Tanaka A, Onishi E, Hashimura T, Ota S, Takeuchi H, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Risk factors for reintubation after anteriorcervical spine surgery: comparative study of patients with cervical spine trauma and patients with cervical degenerative disease. Clin Spine Surg. 2024;37(5):203-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001544

Singleton BN, Morris FK, Yet B, Buggy DJ, Perkins ZB. Effectiveness of intubation devices in patients with cervical spine immobilisation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(5):1055-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.041

Hellmann Rv, Fuhr N, Maia IWA, Gerberi D, Pedrollo D, Bellolio F, et al. Effect of bougie use on first-attempt success in tracheal intubations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;83(2):132-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.08.484

Kim YJ, Hur C, Yoon HK, Lee HC, Park HP, Oh H. Effects of external laryngeal manipulation on cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized crossover trial. J Clin Med. 2021;10(13):2931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132931

Cheong CC, Ong SY, Lim SM, Wan WZ, Mansor M, Chaw SH. Partial vs full glottic view with CMACTM D-blade intubation of airway with simulated cervical spine injury: a randomized controlled trial. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023;20(2):151-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2174850

Aziz MF, Berkow L. Pro-con debate: videolaryngoscopy should be standard of care for tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2023;136(4):683-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006252

D.Weingart S, Barnicle RN, Janke A, Bhagwan SD, Tanzi M, McKenna PJ, et al. A taxonomy of key performance errors for emergency intubation. Am J Emerg Med. 2023;73:137-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.08.035

Published

2024-09-21

How to Cite

1.
Aparicio Morales AI, Garzón Rodríguez A, Agüero Martínez MO, Rizo Fiallo Y, Fiallo Ortiz E, Rodríguez Arias Y. Empleo del videolaringoscopio VALOR en pacientes con patologías de la columna cervical. Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatologí­a [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 21 [cited 2025 Mar. 13];38. Available from: https://revortopedia.sld.cu/index.php/revortopedia/article/view/895

Issue

Section

Artículos originales